By Alex Mellott, CEO, Clearpoint Business Group

On a recent trip, I found myself diving into an episode of Revisionist History, a podcast by Malcolm Gladwell. The episode in question? A deep dive into the children’s show Paw Patrol. At first, it seemed like a quirky detour. But as I listened, I began to notice unsettling parallels between the show’s themes and behaviors I’ve observed in younger members of today’s workforce.

Gladwell highlighted a common parental complaint: “Paw Patrol has ruined my child’s brain.” That provocative statement got me thinking—are we conditioning children in ways that undermine their ability to thrive in a 21st-century workplace?

Each episode of Paw Patrol follows a predictable formula: a problem arises, the characters flounder, and then the hero—usually Ryder—swoops in to save the day, guiding everyone step-by-step to a solution. It’s a tidy narrative, but one that subtly reinforces a troubling message: don’t act until someone tells you what to do.

Curious, I went deeper. I stumbled upon an episode of the Culture Study podcast titled “The Pernicious Laziness of Paw Patrol.” One comment from the hosts stuck with me: in another show, Doc McStuffins, characters ask for help and take responsibility for one another. In Paw Patrol, help is automated. Press a button, and the right pup appears to fix the problem. No collaboration. No critical thinking. Just delegation.

This struck a chord. In both my personal and professional life, I’ve seen how early conditioning can shape adult behavior. When we teach kids that problems are solved by someone else—someone with the tools, the answers, the authority—we risk raising a generation that waits instead of acts.

According to Battelle for Kids, six key competencies define 21st-century readiness:

• Creativity & Innovation
• Critical Thinking & Problem Solving
• Communication & Collaboration
• Information Literacy
• Flexibility & Adaptability
• Initiative & Self-Direction

These aren’t just buzzwords—they’re survival skills in today’s workplace, especially in an era defined by artificial intelligence and rapid change.

But here’s the problem: our systems—educational and professional—often reward the opposite. As a college student, I noticed how many assignments were structured like assembly lines. Follow steps 1 through 10, and you’ll get the right answer. If you get stuck, raise your hand and someone will fix it. Or, more cynically, copy the answer from the internet and move on. (Not that I’m endorsing that, of course.)

This approach discourages exploration, resilience, and independent problem-solving. It teaches compliance, not curiosity. And that’s dangerous.

Because in the real world, there is no step-by-step guide. There’s no Ryder to call. The most successful people I know are the ones who tinker, fail, adapt, and try again. They don’t wait for permission—they take initiative. They don’t fear ambiguity—they embrace it.

So what can we do?

We need to rethink how we teach, lead, and learn. We must create environments—both in classrooms and boardrooms—where experimentation is encouraged, failure is safe, and learning is driven by discovery, not prescription. We must reward initiative, not just accuracy. And we must model the behaviors we want to see: asking questions, trying new things, and embracing the messy, nonlinear process of growth.

Because if we want to raise a generation of thinkers, builders, and leaders, we can’t keep handing them scripts that teach them to wait for the next pup to save the day.

‍